Enhance NIP-XX Document with Event Kind Replication and Identity Tag Features
- Added new `K` and `I` tags to support event kind replication and identity verification in trust attestations.
- Expanded trust level definitions to include replication of custom event kinds specified in the `K` tag.
- Introduced detailed specifications for the `I` tag, including identity proof-of-control signature requirements and usage guidelines.
- Updated event synchronization and conflict resolution processes to incorporate identity verification and key delegation management.
- Enhanced security considerations to address identity tag verification and delegation limits, ensuring robust trust management among relays.
@ -146,11 +148,20 @@ Relay operators create trust attestations toward other relays they wish to enter
- `relay`: WebSocket URL of the target relay
- `relay`: WebSocket URL of the target relay
- `expiry`: Optional expiration timestamp for the attestation
- `expiry`: Optional expiration timestamp for the attestation
- `reason`: How this trust relationship was established
- `reason`: How this trust relationship was established
- `K`: Comma-separated list of event kinds to replicate in near real-time (in addition to directory events)
- `I`: Identity tag with npub, nonce, and proof-of-control signature (same format as Kind 39103)
**Trust Levels:**
**Trust Levels:**
- `high`: Full replication of all directory events
- `high`: Full replication of all directory events plus all kinds specified in `K` tag
- `medium`: Selective replication based on additional criteria
- `medium`: Selective replication of directory events plus kinds specified in `K` tag based on additional criteria
- `low`: Minimal replication, primarily for discovery
- `low`: Minimal replication of directory events only, `K` tag kinds may be filtered
**Event Kind Replication:**
- **Directory Events**: Always replicated regardless of `K` tag (kinds 0, 3, 5, 1984, 10002, 10000, 10050)
- **Custom Kinds**: Additional event kinds specified in the `K` tag are replicated based on trust level
- **Specialization**: Enables relay operators to specialize in specific data types (e.g., long-form content, marketplace events, etc.)
- **Near Real-time**: Events matching `K` tag kinds are replicated with minimal delay
- **Bidirectional**: Replication occurs both to and from the trusted relay for specified kinds
### Group Tag Attestation (Kind 39102)
### Group Tag Attestation (Kind 39102)
@ -177,7 +188,7 @@ Relays can attest to arbitrary string values used as tags to create logical grou
### Public Key Advertisement (Kind 39103)
### Public Key Advertisement (Kind 39103)
Relays advertise public keys that will be used in future operations:
Relays advertise public keys that will be used in future operations. Each relay MUST limit the number of unused key delegations to 512 per identity. Key delegations expire after 30 days if not used in any database operations:
```json
```json
{
{
@ -189,7 +200,8 @@ Relays advertise public keys that will be used in future operations:
2. **Signature Chain Validation**: Verify the complete signature chain
2. **Signature Chain Validation**: Verify the complete signature chain
3. **Consensus Voting**: For disputed events, trusted relays vote on validity
3. **Identity Verification**: Validate `I` tag signatures if present
4. **Byzantine Fault Tolerance**: System remains functional with up to 1/3 malicious nodes
4. **Consensus Voting**: For disputed events, trusted relays vote on validity
5. **Byzantine Fault Tolerance**: System remains functional with up to 1/3 malicious nodes
#### 4. Trust Propagation
#### 5. Trust Propagation
Trust relationships can be inherited through the web of trust:
Trust relationships can be inherited through the web of trust:
@ -269,13 +366,29 @@ Relay A Relay B Relay C
### Security Considerations
### Security Considerations
1. **Identity Verification**: Relay identity keys MUST be verified through the extended NIP-11 relay information document. The relay MUST prove control of the private key through the `nonce` and `sig` fields, and the same keypair MUST be used to sign consortium events, creating a cryptographic binding between network address and relay identity.
1. **Identity Verification**: Relay identity keys MUST be verified through the extended NIP-11 relay information document. The relay MUST prove control of the private key through the `nonce` and `sig` fields, and the same keypair MUST be used to sign consortium events, creating a cryptographic binding between network address and relay identity.
2. **Trust Boundaries**: Operators should carefully configure trust levels and inheritance policies
2. **Trust Boundaries**: Operators should carefully configure trust levels and inheritance policies
3. **Rate Limiting**: Implement rate limiting to prevent spam and DoS attacks
3. **Rate Limiting**: Implement rate limiting to prevent spam and DoS attacks
4. **Signature Validation**: All events and attestations MUST be cryptographically verified
4. **Signature Validation**: All events and attestations MUST be cryptographically verified, including `I` tag proof-of-control signatures
5. **Privacy**: Sensitive consortium communications SHOULD use ECDH encryption
5. **Privacy**: Sensitive consortium communications SHOULD use ECDH encryption
6. **Address Binding**: The extended NIP-11 document serves as the authoritative source for relay identity verification. Relays MUST NOT accept consortium events from identities that cannot be verified through their NIP-11 document's signature mechanism. The `nonce` field SHOULD be regenerated periodically to maintain security.
6. **Address Binding**: The extended NIP-11 document serves as the authoritative source for relay identity verification. Relays MUST NOT accept consortium events from identities that cannot be verified through their NIP-11 document's signature mechanism. The `nonce` field SHOULD be regenerated periodically to maintain security.
7. **Key Rotation**: If a relay rotates its identity key, it MUST update both its NIP-11 document and republish its Relay Identity Announcement to maintain consortium membership.
7. **Key Rotation**: If a relay rotates its identity key, it MUST update both its NIP-11 document and republish its Relay Identity Announcement to maintain consortium membership.
8. **Delegation Limits**: The 512 unused key delegation limit prevents resource exhaustion attacks. Relays MUST enforce this limit strictly and implement proper cleanup mechanisms.
9. **Identity Tag Security**: `I` tag signatures MUST be verified before accepting events. Invalid signatures MUST result in event rejection to prevent identity spoofing. The signature binds the identity to the specific delegate pubkey, preventing key reuse across different identities.
10. **Expiration Enforcement**: The 30-day expiration policy for unused delegations MUST be enforced to prevent unbounded storage growth and maintain system performance.
11. **Nonce Uniqueness**: Nonces in `I` tags SHOULD be unique per event to prevent replay attacks, though this is not strictly required due to the event-specific context.
12. **Delegate Authorization**: The `I` tag signature cryptographically proves that the identity holder explicitly authorized the delegate key for this specific use. This prevents unauthorized delegation and ensures accountability for delegated actions.
### Implementation Guidelines
### Implementation Guidelines
#### Relay Operators
#### Relay Operators
@ -285,6 +398,11 @@ Relay A Relay B Relay C
3. Implement Byzantine fault tolerance mechanisms
3. Implement Byzantine fault tolerance mechanisms
4. Monitor consortium health and trust relationships
4. Monitor consortium health and trust relationships
5. Provide configuration options for users to opt-out of replication
5. Provide configuration options for users to opt-out of replication
6. Implement key delegation tracking and cleanup mechanisms
7. Enforce the 512 unused delegation limit per identity
8. Run daily cleanup processes to remove expired delegations
9. Validate `I` tag signatures on all incoming events
10. Maintain usage statistics for delegation management
#### Client Developers
#### Client Developers
@ -292,6 +410,10 @@ Relay A Relay B Relay C
2. Clients SHOULD respect user preferences for directory event replication
2. Clients SHOULD respect user preferences for directory event replication
3. Clients MAY use consortium information for relay discovery
3. Clients MAY use consortium information for relay discovery
4. Clients SHOULD validate directory events from multiple sources
4. Clients SHOULD validate directory events from multiple sources
5. Clients MAY generate `I` tags with proof-of-control for identity references
6. Clients SHOULD validate `I` tag signatures when processing events
7. Clients MAY use npub identities from `I` tags for user-friendly display
8. Clients SHOULD implement proper nonce generation for `I` tag security
### Backwards Compatibility
### Backwards Compatibility
@ -311,6 +433,14 @@ This design draws inspiration from the democratic Byzantine Fault Tolerant appro
3. **Automatic Synchronization**: Reduces user burden while maintaining decentralization
3. **Automatic Synchronization**: Reduces user burden while maintaining decentralization
4. **Byzantine Fault Tolerance**: Ensures system reliability even with malicious participants
4. **Byzantine Fault Tolerance**: Ensures system reliability even with malicious participants
5. **Optional Participation**: Maintains Nostr's principle of optional protocol extensions
5. **Optional Participation**: Maintains Nostr's principle of optional protocol extensions
6. **Event Kind Specialization**: The `K` tag enables relay specialization for specific data types
**Specialization Examples:**
- **Content Relays**: Specialize in long-form content (kind 30023), articles, and media
- **Social Relays**: Focus on social interactions (kinds 1, 6, 7) and reactions